‹ Remarks on Comments on Chapter 14, and a Concluding Note •
The March issue of JPP has been available for a while, and the June issue has just come out, so I thought I would post both. There are many people who use these links to access the articles, but unfortunately I cannot be relied upon to post them timeously. If anyone would like to “take over” a journal and post a notice when a new issue comes out, please feel free to volunteer. It is one way to keep on top of new articles coming out in the journals one may wish to be reading anyway.
Thomas Pogge (Philosophy, Yale, ANU, and Oslo), “Making War on Terrorists: Reflections on Harming the Innocent“: 1-25. “[W]hen a choice must be made between promoting the interests of our country—our government, citizens, or corporations—and those of innocent people abroad, we routinely prioritize the former without so much as examining the cost that our choices will impose on the lives of the innocent.”
Penny Weiss (Political Science, Purdue), “Sei Shônagon and the Politics of Form“: 26-47. A discussion of Sei Shônagon’s Pillow Book, its form, and its standing as a contribution to political thought.
Lea L. Ypi (Social and Political Sciences, European University Institute), “Statist Cosmopolitanism“: 48-71. “[I]f we accept that every needy individual in the world has a justified claim to certain primary goods (moral cosmopolitanism) and if the nature of the claim is such that it requires the transformation of political institutions (political cosmopolitanism), then political communities provide the unique associative sphere in which cosmopolitanism obtains political agency, may be legitimately enforced and cohesively maintained.”
Nien-hê Hsieh (Legal Studies and Business Ethics, Pennsylvania), “Justice in Production“: 72-100. A survey article of literature on the implications of egalitarian justice for economic production, with the conclusion that there are more constraints of justice on production than commonly thought.
Ben Colburn (Philosophy, Cambridge), “The Concept of Voluntariness“: 101-111. A short debate article on Serena Olsaretti’s definition of voluntariness defending the claim that well-informedness is crucial to voluntariness and that the standard of relatively unacceptable consequences should be restricted to serious prudential harms.
Serena Olsaretti (Philosophy, Cambridge), “The Concept of Voluntariness: A Reply“: 112-121. Olsaretti’s reply defends the claim that the moral character of options can affect the voluntariness of choice.
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. Public Reason welcomes participation from members of the academic community with an interest in political philosophy and theory. Your registration as a participant is subject to approval. Please specify your academic institutional affiliation on the registration form.
No comments
Comments feed for this article