Reading group on Amartya Sen’s “The Idea of Justice”?

Would anyone here would be interested in taking part in a reading group on Amartya Sen’s new book, The Idea of Justice?  If so, I would be interested in starting it up in January 2010.

Great suggestion Blain. You can count me in!

Cheers,
Colin

Excuse my ignorace, but would this be an online reading group?

I would love to be in on this.

Sounds good - I would try and participate.

@ Mats Volberg: yes, my proposal is for this to be an online reading group (similar in format to the Estlund and Brettschneider ones). My apologies for not being clearer in my original post.

The book is quite long (400+ pages), and divided into 18 chapters, so there is an opportunity for many people to participate. However, even if, say, only six people choose to participate, it should be manageable (3 chapters for each person; the individual chapters are not that long).

Right now the following people have expressed an interest in participating: Colin Farrelly, Simon May, Paul Gowder, Jonathan Quong, Bill Edmunson, and myself. (If I misinterpreted your post, please let me know.) There’s obviously no rush on this, so I’ll wait a few more weeks before trying to come up with a concrete plan.

Also, feel free to e-mail others whom you think might be interested in participating (although I assume that participation would have to be limited to members of this blog).

Thanks,
Blain

Hi Blain,

I’m happy to participate, but I wouldn’t want to sign up to be responsible for three chapters - that’s just more than I could manage in the second semester. Sorry, but realistically I think I should limit myself to being responsible for just one chapter.

Cheers,
Jon

Sorry, Jonathan, for being presumptuous in thinking that 3 chapters would be an insignificant burden for anyone. That clearly is not the case. Even 1 chapter, obviously, is a lot of work (as I found out in the reading group that you ran a year ago). I posted without thinking.

In any case, I’ll just wait a few weeks to see who else is interested. If we don’t have enough participants to distribute the burden in way that is acceptable to all interested, then I guess that the group just will not happen.

No worries - you weren’t being presumptuous, it’s just that the second semester will be busy for me and I didn’t want to over-commit myself.

Cheers,
Jon

Count me in, though if we end up with more ‘posters’ than chapters I would cede my spot to someone else, and just participate via the comments section.

I’m interested in participating, but I have not participated in a reading group here before, so I’d appreciate a brief summary of the rules (especially if you would be expecting me to have something clever to say about one or more chapters).

Best,

Peter

P.S. I’ve been lurking for a while, and just became a full-fledged member. Hello all!

I’m in exactly the same position as Peter. I was planning on reading this anyway, and getting a chance to talk it over here sounds great.

Charles

I think I’d be interested in participating as well, although I think I couldn’t really do more than a chapter - and like Peter, would find it helpful if I could have some guidelines about what sort of thing would be expected of me.

I would be interested in participating in this reading group.

Colleen

Generally what happens is that one person posts some discussion of a chapter. (Probably for this book, we would need to move fairly quickly since there are 18 chapters, so maybe one chapter a week?) Then everyone else comments on the discussion. That’s really it. One thing I would suggest though is that if we start in January, then people try to read the book in advance of that. It can get difficult reading a book at the same time as keeping up with the discussion of it.

I’m interested in participating, but as a graduate student I don’t have posting privileges, so that might make me ineligible for being the main commentator for a chapter.

Hello Blain,

I’d very much like to participate. It’s a great idea.

Alex

Ditto what Derek Bowman said.

After the Sen reading group, I’d be keen to have a group on Avishai Margalit’s new book, On Compromise and Rotten Compromises. It should be out in a month or two, and promises to be an important work in an area of moral and political philosophy that has not received the attention it deserves.

Re: graduate students leading discussion on chapters, there’s no reason why that is ruled out. People should contact Blain if they are interested in presenting, and then whatever allocation of chapters to people makes sense for the reading group as a whole will happen.

I’d also like to participate, if there’s still room for one more.

Thanks to all of you who have expressed an interest in taking part in the reading group! Unfortunately, I now have too many participants, given the number of chapters in the book, so I cannot accept any more requests. I’ll be sending out an e-mail to everyone who has expressed an interest in the group with more information in the near future.

Of course, even people who end up not being responsible for a particular chapter of the book are welcome to participate in the discussions.

I’d like to be included as a recipient of the email message you mentioned in the previous post. thanks very much

I see you’re all set in terms of participants, but if someone backs out, count me in as a substitute.

I’m interested, please include me on any email list.

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. Public Reason welcomes participation from members of the academic community with an interest in political philosophy and theory. Your registration as a participant is subject to approval. Please specify your academic institutional affiliation on the registration form.