Category Archives: Discussion

Brettschneider Reading Group: Conclusion – Value Democracy at Home and Abroad

I’ve been appallingly remiss in fulfilling my duties this time around. In an effort to make good, I’ve spent several days poring over these excellent commentaries and discussions, as well as reacquainting myself with Corey’s wonderful book, which has taught … Continue reading

Posted in Books, Discussion, Posts, Reading Group | Tagged | 6 Comments

Brettschneider Reading Group: Introduction and Chapter 1

I’m very pleased to begin our reading group on Corey Brettschneider’s new book: When the State Speaks, What Should it Say? How Democracies Can Protect Expression and Promote Equality. In this post I’ll offer a brief summary of the introduction … Continue reading

Posted in Books, Discussion, Posts, Reading Group | 6 Comments

PHILTV on Public Reason and Religion (Kevin Vallier and Jason Brennan)

Jason Brennan (Georgetown) and I (Bowling Green) have put together a conversation on public reason/political liberalism and its treatment of religious contributions to public life (which would not have been possible without the help of the great folks over at … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Notices, Politics, Posts, Public Philosophy, Video | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Petition on the AHRC and “The Big Society”

The petition can be found here and I urge readers to consider signing it. It makes a point of principle, not politics: that the UK-based Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) — which funds research in areas such as law and … Continue reading

Posted in Academia, Discussion | Leave a comment

Most Cited Works in Political Theory

As part of a project to assess the relative impact of different works of political theory I ran a google scholar citation search on the authors listed below.  Works had to be at least 10 years old, and with a … Continue reading

Posted in Books, Discussion, Posts | 17 Comments

OPR VI.17. Arguments from Abtraction and the Claims of Agency

Summary of OPR.VI.17 Chapter VI begins by reminding us of an important conclusion from the previous chapter, namely, that the Members of the Public (MoP) will be confronted with a large set of rules of social morality, and that with … Continue reading

Posted in Books, Discussion, Posts, Reading Group | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Which philosophy journal do you think is best?

Readers are encouraged to visit this link where they can vote for their favourite philosophy journals. The choice is fairly comprehensive with nearly 130 journals listed and more added daily. There have been more than 10,000 votes registered and there … Continue reading

Posted in Academia, Blogosphere, Discussion, Journals | Leave a comment

The Order of Public Reason Reading Group Begins Monday, January 17th

This post is an announcement that our spring reading group on Gerald Gaus’s new The Order of Public Reason reading group begins a week from today on January 17th. We have a number of fabulous contributors who will take on various sections … Continue reading

Posted in Books, Discussion, Notices, Reading Group | Leave a comment

Political Competence Bleg

I’m currently writing papers involving the idea of political incompetence, i.e., lacking competence to exercise political power properly.I’d like to start this thread just to collect intuitions, or, if you’re up for it, conclusions of short arguments.  Question: If you … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Advice for article reviewers: what is best practice?

Readers may be familiar with my “Publishing Advice for Graduate Students” which addressed issues from publishing book reviews and conference proceedings to replies, full length articles, and submitting book contracts successfully. I have been genuinely thrilled by its reception as … Continue reading

Posted in Academia, Discussion, Journals | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Reading Group Proposal: Gerald Gaus, The Order of Public Reason

For those of you who do not know, Cambridge is about to publish Jerry Gaus’s new book, The Order of Public Reason. It will be out in hardback by the first of next year. Here’s a general description of the … Continue reading

Posted in Books, Discussion, Posts, Reading Group | 21 Comments

Query @ public reason

What is the single best thing to read about public reason?  Something by Josh Cohen?  David Estlund?  Rawls himself?  Other?  (Particulars appreciated.)  If context matters, say I want something that will convince an opponent that the later Rawlsian approach to … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts | 3 Comments

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and Political Philosophy

Speaking of non-ideal theory (or ideal theory in less than ideal contexts)… I am curious to hear whether my fellow public reasoners believe that the recent US Supreme Court ruling on campaign finance should have any impact on our work … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts, Problems | 2 Comments

A Thought on the Ideal and Non-Ideal Theory Distinction

Many of you have probably seen Simmons’ article just out in PPA on ideal and non-ideal theory. Simmons defends Rawls’ account of the ideal/non-ideal theory distinction and his paper is a must read. That said, I have been ruminating over … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts, Problems | 12 Comments

The Burqa in France

According to the BBC, in the latest twist in l’affaire du foulard/voile, a French parliamentary committee has recommended a ban on women wearing Islamic face veils in public [Correction: the proposal applies to public facilities, such as hospitals and mass transit, … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts, Problems | 2 Comments

Query: Should the US defend Google?

So, another query: Should the US defend Google?  Why or why not?US to protest formally to China over Google ‘attacks’

Posted in Discussion, Posts, Problems | Leave a comment

humanitarian intervention question

A question: do people think international humanitarian intervention (or any international intervention, for that matter; perhaps even any intervention at all) has to be coercive?  That is, as a conceptual issue, is intervention necessarily coercive?

Posted in Discussion, Posts, Problems | 4 Comments

Credit Cards and Exploitation

PBS‘ Frontline this week aired an interesting episode on the credit card industry, which began with a discussion of some of the controversial practices initiated by Providian and soon adopted by the bulk of its competitors. I think the episode raises some interesting philosophical questions about … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts, Problems | 4 Comments

Meet Stan Kazan and his Clan

Meet my neighbors, the Kazans. Stan and his wife Jan live together with their three grown children (one daughter and two sons) who are there until they can afford places of their own. They are a decent family, and they … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts | 12 Comments

At the risk of starting another discussion on libertarianism… but for the record.

Kevin asked me to post these comments which I had hoped would make it onto the Molinari web page a long time ago. They provide a short response to some replies by Jan Narveson and Roderick Long to some comments … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts | Leave a comment

Condorcet’s Jury Theorem as an Argument against Mass Democracy

Ok, if the mathematics discussed in my last post are right, here’s the upshot: Condorcet’s Jury Theorem (in its original formulation) says that in an election between A and B (where A  is the right choice and B is the … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Condorcet Jury Theorem Mathematics Help

If the conditions of the Condorcet Jury Theorem hold, then every additional jurist/voter adds some marginal amount of accuracy to the jury as a whole.  However, this jury experiences diminishing marginal returns.  If every juror has a 51% chance of … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts | Tagged , , | 14 Comments

Vote Buying and Selling

Here are some questions I’m thinking about, and I wonder what you think. Suppose, for the sake or argument, I’ve established that voters have a duty to vote for candidates or policies which they justifiedly believe will promote the common … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts, Problems | 19 Comments

“The Fight for Science (and Justice)” (Part 2)

This post is a continuation of my earlier post from December. Last week President Obama give this excellent speech to the National Academy of Sciences.  He pledged to invest 3% of GDP for science research (basic and applied research).  He … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts | 1 Comment

What is a Means of Production?

Though I’m a political philosopher, Marxism/Socialism is not my area of expertise.  Still, I was surprised when, while teaching an essay by Kai Nielsen the other day, I discovered that I really don’t know what a means of production is supposed … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts, Problems, Teaching | 15 Comments

Topics and Issues in Voting Ethics

Hi everyone,I’m currently writing a book called The Ethics of Voting, and thought I’d ask you for advice and comments about what you’d like to see and what you think is important.  The book will cover the personals ethics of … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Notices, Posts | 4 Comments

Fact Sensitivity of Principles – Something to get folks talking

Hi public reasoners. So, as you all know, GA Cohen let rip an attack against the fact-sensitivity of fundamental political principles in his 2003 PPA article, “Facts and Principles,” and then in his book Rescuing Justice and Equality.  People have responded … Continue reading

Posted in Books, Discussion, Posts | 9 Comments

On Public Reason and Justificatory Liberalism

Hi All, This isn’t really my area, but I’ve been thinking a bit about public reason lately (in preparing to comment on a paper at the APA) and I could think of no better place to put my thoughts than … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts | 11 Comments

The Ironic Tragedy of Human Rights

Fellow Public Reasoners, I recently posted an essay, “The Ironic Tragedy of Human Rights,” on the Social Science Research Network (at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1330693). As you can see from the summary below, the argument amounts to a very radical critique of human rights. This has left me wondering: … Continue reading

Posted in Articles, Discussion, Posts | Tagged , , , | 9 Comments

Response to Alon Harel on Chapter Seven of Democratic Rights, “Judicial Review: Balancing Rights and Procedures.”

 I would like to thank Alon for his comments on Chapter 7, especially given the importance of his own work on the topic of the chapter.  My conversations with him on this subject also have helped me to clarify my … Continue reading

Posted in Books, Discussion, Posts, Reading Group | Leave a comment

Brettschneider Response to Alex Zakaras on Chapter Six of Democratic Rights, “Private Property and the Right to Welfare.”

Thanks to Alex for his thoughtful and helpful post on this chapter.  His comments are especially helpful in thinking through how my account might respond to a kind of libertarian or “classically liberal” challenge. Specifically, Alex develops such a potential … Continue reading

Posted in Books, Discussion, Posts, Reading Group | Leave a comment

Long-overdue replies to comments on “Rosa Parks”

I’ve been very negligent in replying to Ben’s and Andy’s excellent comments on my PPPS democratic leadership paper.  It being Christmas Eve, I’ve finally found time to hastily write up my thoughts!  They’re lengthy, so I’ve followed the pattern and … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts, Symposia | Leave a comment

Comments on Gowder’s “Rosa Parks”

I’ve written some fairly extensive comments on the podcast that Paul Gowder posted a few weeks ago (or, more precisely, on the written paper (.pdf)).  Since they’re several pages long, I’ve decided to link to them as a .pdf rather … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts, Symposia | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The Fight for Science (and Justice)

Moral and political philosophers are concerned with how we ought to act, as both individuals and collectivity as societies.  So we ask questions like: What makes an action right or wrong?  What constitutes the “good life”?  How should society distribute … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts | 25 Comments

Brettschneider Response to Jim Wilson on Democratic Rights, Chapter V, “The Rights of the Punished.”

Many thanks to Jim Wilson for an excellent discussion of Chapter V, “The Rights of the Punished.”  I will focus on two issues raised by his comments.  Both concern the relationship between my own theory and more traditional accounts of … Continue reading

Posted in Books, Discussion, Posts, Reading Group | Leave a comment

The LPGA Demands that Its Players Speak English

Is everyone else as amazed as I am about the recent decision by the Ladies Professional Golf Association [where 45 of the top 120 players on the circuit are South Korean] to demand that all players be conversant in English?  … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts | 3 Comments

The Questions of (Social, Political, Legal, ….) Philosophy

Ah, Fall.  Classes here have started already!  Probably because of what I am teaching this semester I started thinking about the questions we (members and subscribers to this blog and potential members and subscribers of this blog) address.  It seems … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts | 2 Comments

re racial profiling

I just wanted to make some quick comments on racial profiling.  While sympathetic to Keller’s idea that compensation is owed those wrongly stopped, does he propose to cabin this to racial profiling, or does he want all wrongful stops by … Continue reading

Posted in Discussion, Posts | Leave a comment